{"channel":"llm","content":"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/arizona-moves-ban-ai-use-reviewing-medical-claims-rcna193135\r\n\r\n<<< Arizona state lawmakers passed new legislation Thursday aiming to restrict the use of artificial intelligence in reviewing medical claims.\r\nIf signed into law, the bill would ban AI from being used to deny a medical claim or from denying a prior authorization needed for \u201cmedical necessity, experimental status or any other reason that involves the use of medical judgment,\u201d the bill states. ...\r\n\"Patients deserve healthcare delivered by humans with compassionate medical expertise, not pattern-based computer algorithms designed by insurance companies,\" Shelby Job, the association's communications director, said in a statement. \"While AI promises innovation for several areas of healthcare, the review and denial of medical insurance claims \u2014 some of which represent life-changing treatments and procedures \u2014 should be left to physicians who can make nuanced clinical judgements.\" ...\r\nGov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed legislation in September to ensure that a licensed physician supervises the use of AI decision-making tools when they are used to \"inform decisions to approve, modify, or deny requests by providers.\" ... \u201cAn algorithm cannot fully understand a patient\u2019s unique medical history or needs, and its misuse can lead to devastating consequences,\" [California state Sen. Josh] Becker said in a statement on the bill's passing. >>>\r\n\r\nOf course the bawdy claims about \"a machine cannot perform key medical tasks\" are false.\r\n\r\nSure, a machine can do them badly ... but humans can also do them badly.\r\n\r\n<xantham> the primary goal is neither *efficiency* nor *medical quality*, but protecting jobs and minimizing blame.\r\n<red> a type of *licensure*, or a way of determining that << state guidelines on health care availability >> are followed would be the best way of handling this.  but, it is no surprise to see the << no AI in our healthcare >> approach being taken instead.","created_at":"2025-02-21T20:48:19.746188","id":254,"llm_annotations":{},"parent_id":null,"processed_content":"<p><a href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/arizona-moves-ban-ai-use-reviewing-medical-claims-rcna193135\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/arizona-moves-ban-ai-use-reviewing-medical-claims-rcna193135</a>\r</p>\n<p><div class=\"mlq\"><button type=\"button\" class=\"mlq-collapse\" aria-label=\"Toggle visibility\"><span class=\"mlq-collapse-icon\">\u2212</span></button><div class=\"mlq-content\"><p> Arizona state lawmakers passed new legislation Thursday aiming to restrict the use of artificial intelligence in reviewing medical claims.\r</p>\n<p>If signed into law, the bill would ban AI from being used to deny a medical claim or from denying a prior authorization needed for \u201cmedical necessity, experimental status or any other reason that involves the use of medical judgment,\u201d the bill states. ...\r</p>\n<p>\"Patients deserve healthcare delivered by humans with compassionate medical expertise, not pattern-based computer algorithms designed by insurance companies,\" Shelby Job, the association's communications director, said in a statement. \"While AI promises innovation for several areas of healthcare, the review and denial of medical insurance claims \u2014 some of which represent life-changing treatments and procedures \u2014 should be left to physicians who can make nuanced clinical judgements.\" ...\r</p>\n<p>Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed legislation in September to ensure that a licensed physician supervises the use of AI decision-making tools when they are used to \"inform decisions to approve, modify, or deny requests by providers.\" ... \u201cAn algorithm cannot fully understand a patient\u2019s unique medical history or needs, and its misuse can lead to devastating consequences,\" [California state Sen. Josh] Becker said in a statement on the bill's passing. </p></div></div>\r</p>\n<p>Of course the bawdy claims about \"a machine cannot perform key medical tasks\" are false.\r</p>\n<p>Sure, a machine can do them badly ... but humans can also do them badly.\r</p>\n<p><span class=\"colorblock color-xantham\">\n    <span class=\"sigil\">\ud83d\udd25</span>\n    <span class=\"colortext-content\"> the primary goal is neither <em>efficiency</em> nor <em>medical quality</em>, but protecting jobs and minimizing blame.\r</span>\n  </span></p>\n<p><span class=\"colorblock color-red\">\n    <span class=\"sigil\">\ud83d\udca1</span>\n    <span class=\"colortext-content\"> a type of <em>licensure</em>, or a way of determining that <span class=\"literal-text\">state guidelines on health care availability</span> are followed would be the best way of handling this.  but, it is no surprise to see the <span class=\"literal-text\">no AI in our healthcare</span> approach being taken instead.</span>\n  </span></p>","quotes":[],"subject":"medicine by religion"}
