{"channel":"atacama","content":" tell me what you eat, and i tell you what you are.\r\n the quote was supposed to be \"perfection is achieved when there is nothing left to take away\".\r\n for example: the \"subject\" field. it is, largely, an exercise in digressions. also: the built-in section breaks. just have multiple messages. in a *channel*.\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nthe nested footnotes ( colortext) will have to go. it is nice-to-have for the writer, but too confusing for the reader (man or AI).\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nwhat is left?\r\n\r\na thought. some words. and, commentary.\r\n\r\nsome of the commentary is << load-bearing >>. other parts are for reference for the less-informed reader.\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\n the commentary that makes it clear << left >> means \"remaining\" and not \"the opposite of right\" ... is not load-bearing, normally.","created_at":"2026-06-09T14:34:13.279293","id":808,"llm_annotations":{},"parent_id":null,"processed_content":"

\ud83d\udcac tell me what you eat, and i tell you what you are.\r

\n

\ud83d\udd25 the quote was supposed to be \"perfection is achieved when there is nothing left to take away\".\r

\n

\ud83d\udca1 for example: the \"subject\" field. it is, largely, an exercise in digressions. also: the built-in section breaks. just have multiple messages. in a channel.\r

\n
\n

the nested footnotes \u2699\ufe0f colortext will have to go. it is nice-to-have for the writer, but too confusing for the reader (man or AI).\r

\n
\n

what is left?\r

\n

a thought. some words. and, commentary.\r

\n

some of the commentary is load-bearing. other parts are for reference for the less-informed reader.\r

\n
\n

\ud83d\udd25 the commentary that makes it clear left means \"remaining\" and not \"the opposite of right\" ... is not load-bearing, normally.

","quotes":[{"text":"tell me what you eat, and i tell you what you are.","type":"reference"}],"subject":"brillat-savarin"}