Seen on Substack°hard word ⚙️ https://substack.com/@tedgioia/note/c-128027920 :
Yesterday I did a Google°hard word search°hard word to identify°hard word the most successful°hard word movie of the last 5 years. Instead I got an AI°hard word response°hard word—which I didn°hard word’t ask for. AI°hard word identified°hard word a film°hard word from 2019 as the most popular°hard word movie in the last 5 years. And it even specified°hard word that the movie came out in 2019.
AI°hard word always serves up this garbage°hard word—it makes mistakes a child would easily avoid°hard word. And now tech°hard word CEOs°hard word want AI°hard word to rewrite°hard word history? It won’t even get the dates correct.
It gets worse, Google°hard word AI°hard word seems to think that the period from 2019 through 2024 is five years in duration°hard word. It can’t even count to five without making a mistake.
The period from 2019 to 2024 IS five years. Yes, the whole period would be six years. But if you want a period of 5 years that ends in May 2024, it is 2019-2024.
That Samaritan's°hard word entire°hard word schtick°hard word seems to be saying that AIs°hard word are garbage°hard word because they didn't make the same mistake that he made. And, that the solution is for more people to get an Oxford education like he did.
⚙️ https://www.honest-broker.com/p/5-ways-to-stop-ai-cheating
🔥 It is both a humblebrag°hard word and a completely stupid idea. "Use more Latin°hard word! Don't even allow typewriters°hard word!" His solution is to stick one's°hard word hand in the sands-of-the-past°hard word, and assume°hard word that this will fix everything. Because he's not a technologist°hard word, he's an old musician who thinks he knows everything but very clearly does not.